Home › PFAS › NJ › Suez Water New Jersey Hackensack

PFAS in Suez Water New Jersey Hackensack drinking water

EPA UCMR 5 results for public water system NJ0238001 serving Alpine Boro, Bergenfield Boro, Bogota Boro and others (New Jersey). 8 of 29 PFAS detected.

PFOA (highest result)
14 ppt above 4.0 ppt
PFOS (highest result)
8.1 ppt above 4.0 ppt
PFAS detected
8 of 29 tested
Water system
SUEZ WATER NEW JERSEY HACKENSACK (PWSID NJ0238001)
System size
Large (serves more than 10,000 people)
Samples
16 sample event(s) at 3 sampling point(s), 2024-02-12 to 2025-02-12
Areas served (SDWIS)
Alpine Boro-0202; Bergenfield Boro-0203; Bogota Boro-0204; Carlstadt Boro-0205; Cliffside Park Boro-0206; Closter Boro-0207; Cresskill Boro-0208; Demarest Boro-0209; Dumont Boro-0210; East Rutherford Boro-0212; Edgewater Boro-0213; Emerson Boro-0214; Englewood City-0215; Englewood Cliffs Boro-0216; Fairview Boro-0218; Fort Lee Boro-0219; Guttenberg Town-0903; Hackensack City-0223; Harrington Park Boro-0224; Hasbrouck Heights-0225 …
Counties
Bergen, Hudson
ZIP codes (UCMR 5)
07010, 07020, 07022, 07024, 07030, 07047, 07057, 07067, 07070, 07072, 07073, 07074, 07075, 07087, 07093, 07094, 07417, 07458, 07602, 07603, 07604, 07605, 07606, 07607, 07608, 07620, 07621, 07624, 07626, 07627, 07628, 07630, 07631, 07632, 07640, 07641, 07642, 07643, 07644, 07645 …
Source
EPA UCMR 5 final occurrence data (EPA page last updated 2026-08-28; samples collected January 2023 – December 2025) ↗

UCMR 5 is a one-time EPA monitoring program, not a compliance determination. The values shown are the highest single sample result at any of the system's sampling points; one result above 4.0 ppt does not mean the system violates the PFAS rule, which is judged on running annual averages under separate compliance monitoring. Results describe the public water system, not an individual home.

Lead service lines

This water system is connected with lead service line inventory data on this site:

All PFAS detected

PFASHighest result (ppt)Samples with detectionEPA limit (2024 rule)
PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid)1412 of 124.0 ppt (MCL, 2024 rule)
PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid)8.18 of 124.0 ppt (MCL, 2024 rule)
PFPeA (perfluoropentanoic acid)5.78 of 12—
PFHxA (perfluorohexanoic acid)5.38 of 12—
PFBA (perfluorobutanoic acid)5.21 of 12—
PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonic acid)4.77 of 1210 ppt (2024 rule; proposed for rescission)
PFBS (perfluorobutane sulfonic acid)42 of 12Hazard Index component (2024 rule; proposed for rescission)
PFHpA (perfluoroheptanoic acid)3.22 of 12—

ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). EPA reports UCMR 5 results in µg/L; we multiply by 1,000. “Samples with detection” counts results at or above the UCMR 5 minimum reporting level.

What the limits mean

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits (MCLs) of 4.0 ppt each for PFOA and PFOS, plus 10 ppt for PFHxS, PFNA and HFPO-DA (GenX) and a Hazard Index for mixtures, with compliance based on a running annual average at each sampling point and due in 2029 (EPA ↗). In May 2026 EPA proposed letting systems request two more years for PFOA/PFOS (to April 2031) and rescinding the PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and Hazard Index limits (EPA: extension proposal ↗ · EPA: rescission proposal ↗). These are proposals, not final rules, as of the date this page was built.

What you can do

Other tested systems in the same area

PFAS disclaimer: PFAS results are copied from EPA's UCMR 5 dataset and describe samples taken at a public water system's entry points between 2023 and 2025, not water at any specific address. Levels may have changed since sampling (for example, after new treatment). “Not detected” means below EPA's UCMR 5 minimum reporting level, not zero. This is not a compliance determination or a water test. Contact your water utility for current information.